Jeff, it just occurred to me that I did this in an eBGP environment, not
iBGP as you were asking ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Greene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Cartier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] iBGP Multi-link question
Jeff, in my experience having multiple BGP sessions between two routers,
with different end-points for each session, works fine ...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Cartier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 11:45 AM
Subject: [c-nsp] iBGP Multi-link question
I'm in a scenario where I have two routers, configured with two
loopbacks, connected together via two links. I'm in the process of
transitioning from one loopback to the other and I was wondering if
there are any caveats to having two sessions up...one BGP session to the
first lookback (existing), then another BGP session up to the second
loopback (new).
I don't believe their should be any issues with this...and I don't see
any documentation suggesting otherwise...just thought I'd ask to be
certain :-)
ROUTER1============ROUTER2
Lo1:10.1.1.1/32 Lo1:10.1.2.1/32
Lo2:10.1.1.2/32 Lo2:10.1.2.2/32
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
