Hi All > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ang Kah Yik > Sent: 12 September 2008 12:39 > To: julien leroiso > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] do I need acl on wan bgp port ? > > > Hi Julien, > > This topic may actually be more suited to other mailing lists such as > NANOG rather than a Cisco specific list. > Anyway, I believe it is more common that ISPs deploy the use of uRPF > (unicast reverse path forwarding) rather than ACLs. >
We use route-maps/prefix-lists to filter incoming BGP, that is more manageable than having to rewrite a single access-list when the bogons list changes, for example. Robert Robert Smales IP Provide Engineer Cable&Wireless Europe, Asia & US www.cw.com This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive managed e-mail security service, visit http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Cable and Wireless plc Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525 Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
