Here you go PE1#sh ip bgp vpnv4 rd 894:1 5.14.93.0 BGP routing table entry for 894:1:5.14.93.0/24, version 222 Paths: (3 available, best #2, table ipvpn_00000001) Advertised to update-groups: 1 65535 5.14.95.244 (metric 11) from 5.14.95.244 (5.14.95.244) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal Extended Community: SoO:894:1 RT:894:2 mpls labels in/out 26/23 65535 5.14.93.222 from 5.14.93.222 (5.14.93.253) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best Extended Community: SoO:894:1 RT:894:2 mpls labels in/out 26/nolabel 65535, (received-only) 5.14.93.222 from 5.14.93.222 (5.14.93.253) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external mpls labels in/out 26/nolabel
PE2#sh ip bgp vpnv4 rd 894:1 5.14.93.0 BGP routing table entry for 894:1:5.14.93.0/24, version 237 Paths: (3 available, best #1, table ipvpn_00000001) Advertised to update-groups: 1 65535 5.14.93.226 from 5.14.93.226 (5..14.93.254) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best Extended Community: SoO:894:1 RT:894:2 mpls labels in/out 23/nolabel 65535, (received-only) 5.14.93.226 from 5.14.93.226 (5.14.93.254) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external mpls labels in/out 23/nolabel 65535 5.14.95.243 (metric 11) from 5.14.95.243 (5.14.95.243) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal Extended Community: SoO:894:1 RT:894:2 mpls labels in/out 23/26 inbound route-map from CE2 to PE2 route-map ipvpn_00000001 permit 10 set extcommunity soo 894:1 route-map ipvpn_00000001 permit 20 set local-preference 90 ! ----- Original Message ---- From: David Freedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:51:55 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP-VPN CE-PE local pref problem can you post "show ip bgp vpnv4 rd <rd> x.x.x.x/y" from both PEs ? for the prefix in question? Dave Mark Tech wrote: > Hi > I have set up a dual homed IP-VPN network between 2 PE's and 2 CE's using > SoO - thas all working fine. I have added an inbound route-map to the 'backup' PE and CE to reduce the local preference in order to make the other PE and CE the preferred gateways. > > CE1--------PE1 primary > | | > CE2--------PE2 backup > > The CE local pref works fine, however on the PE side, local pref doesn't seem > to have any affect, i.e. I have reduced the local pref to 90 on the backup link, however if I check the routing in the backup PE, nothing seems to have changed. Can I just check that local pref actually works across an MP-BGP environment? > > If so I must be doing something wrong > > Regards > > Mark > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/