On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nathan, > > It sounds like what you want to do should be possible. I'm not sure if the > 7206 can do it or not. I'm pretty sure a Redback SE-400 can do it. ... > I have no idea if this is even close to a working config but it is the way I > would think it should work.
Unfortunately it doesn't :-( I'll abandon the idea of the 7206 having an IP in the VLAN. I'm left with two aal5snap PVCs coming into my 7206 router on the same physical interface, and I want to connect them so that VLAN tags go through. The CPEs are configured with switchport trunk, and several VLANs. If I configure a point-to-point interface for each PVC, with atm route-bridged ip and encapsulation aal5snap, and an IP, I can access the IPs in Vlan1 on the CPEs, so far so good. The CPEs can communicate if I give them IPs in different subnets, and static routes, ok. I want the CPEs to be in the same L2 network. If I say bridge 1 protocol vlan-bridge bridge irb and put the two interfaces into that bridge-group, no ping no arp. If I join the PVCs into a single "point-to-multipoint" interface, no ping no arp. Annoyingly, this is the exact counterpoint to a recent problem of mine, where I couldn't do an xconnect because I wanted an L3 interface on one end of the xconnect. Here I'd be glad to do an xconnect at ATM level, but can I do that when both interfaces are on the same router? I just want my PA-A3 to bridge the PVCs together, like it was an ATM switch . . . Can I do that and how? -- Thanks Nathan _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/