Anything that someone with a bit of BGP knowledge can figure out would be ok to include - does that answer your actual question? ;) We're a service provider so anything you can find out about us with RADB would be the same (if not less) than you can figure out from us with some BGP tables...
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 11, 2008 4:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] RPSL Popularity and Usage What are your thoughts on how much routing detail to put in there in terms of security? Thanks Tom -----Original Message----- From: Paul Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:39 PM To: Kacprzynski, Tomasz; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] RPSL Popularity and Usage We totally rely on RADB in particular .. all our peering and customer BGP sessions are filtered against it's data. It's not bulletproof by any means but a reasonable method of filtering IP blocks in my opinion... Paul -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 11, 2008 4:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] RPSL Popularity and Usage Hello Just wanted to ask how must is Internet Routing Registry used with RPSL currently on the Internet? Do a lot of providers still rely on that to create configurations or is that just more of a documentation process that doesn't get updated after the first use? Thank you for your input. Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
