Hi Tim, > I have heard several people say an iBGP version is messy. What is the > difference? (I'm not opposed to the eBGP config, just like to know > what both look like.)
>From memory... We tried route reflectors for the PE-CE iBGP edge. Need to use a route-map to set next-hop-self and there was something else that was qwerky but I can't remember currently. Also, the TAC advised that PE-CE iBGP was not a supported configuration. Thanks, Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
