Thanks Pete & Pete for your insight. :-) I was hoping to get more feedback from engineers, but this definitely helps.
/bs On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Pete Templin <peteli...@templin.org> wrote: > Brian Spade wrote: > > What is the best way to configure OSPF to inject all 50+ SVIs into the >> routing domain? >> >> Would you configure network statements for all SVI networks and passive >> the >> interfaces? >> Would you configure OSPF on the uplink interfaces only and redistributed >> connected to create type-5 externals? >> > > If it were me, the SVIs would be announced into BGP, so that my OSPF world > stayed small and clean. > > That said, remember that the network statement(s) only have to match, > through wildcard math, the _IP addresses_ of the interfaces to be included > in OSPF. If you run a single area, 'network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0' > is all you need. Flipside, if you want to lock down OSPF to the point that > shifting an interface within a subnet causes OSPF to drop so you can catch > the culprit in the act, 'network 10.20.30.254 0.0.0.0 area 0' matches > exactly that one address (but the interface's correct netmask is used when > inserting the route into OSPF). > > pt > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/