Hi, On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09:26AM -0500, Chris Wallace wrote: > Probably just a fluke, it happened to be that one of the 9 or so fans > wasn't spinning at the proper RPM's.
Which is exactly my point - the fans are monitored very well by the onboard
diagnostics, and I find it surprising that a "refurbished" router (which
should be checked for defects, or near-defects) should have fan tray
that's already near-failed...
In my experience with 6500 FANs, they only complain when one of the fans
is really defective, as in "you take out the try, 8 fans will continue to
spin for 30 seconds, the 9th will stop after 3 seconds".
But we're not using Cisco refurb any way - as has been said: they seem
to be doing this to show "good will" and stop customers from getting
their hardware elsewhere - but all they do is demonstrate lack of
interest.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpSfddAvBIZW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
