On Saturday 28 February 2009 12:59:18 am Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > I'll pretty much agree with this in every respect for > 7600 at well. SRC1 and SRC2 have multiple and serious > bugs in BGP and RSVP which are fixed in SRC3. SRC3 is > really the drop dead minimum place you want to be, and > other than BFD hasn't done anything really "bad" yet. We > threw SRD away after quickly finding that route-map > inbound continue was broken (very nasty) and the SNMP > bridge mib was broken, and yeah its pretty unnecessary > feature-wise anyways.
Let's just hope that whichever SR* train ends up having 4- byte ASN code by end of the year is stable, as that is what might force most of us to move from SRC, assuming 4-byte ASN support isn't included for it. Need to check with our account team on this. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
