Hi. Which direction are you trying to prioritize? In the first post the policy were on the Dialer0-interface (traffic from LAN towards DSL), but in the last post it's on the Fa4-interface (traffic from DSL towards LAN).
I assume it's the first one because there is less point shaping when going from slow to fast interfaces. It also fit's better with the 128k cap in the shaper. But as Peter sort of pointed out, 70% out of 128k isn't much... -- Pelle _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/