On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:26 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Why 2 at each IDC? Since each box acts as a backup for the other,
if IDC #1 goes down - then the GSS at IDC #2 takes over.
Because if IDC #1 goes offline entirely, your DNS for whatever
services you're running are now hanging by a single thread in IDC #2,
until IDC #1 comes back up.
What benefit, other than to Cisco share value, would someone get to
having 2x GSS at each IDC?
See above. I'm not a salesman, I derive no benefit from suggesting
folks overload on GSSes. From an availability standpoint, that's
simply my considered professional opinion, YMMV.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@cisco.com> // +852.6904.8571 mobile
Our dreams are still big; it's just the future that got small.
-- Jason Scott
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
