On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:28 +0200, Łukasz Bromirski wrote: > On 2009-05-08 21:18, Stephen Kratzer wrote: > > > The ASR is certainly a better choice, but cost is an overriding factor. Does > > anything in particular makes the 7600 a poor choice aside from the existence > > of better alternatives? Thanks. > > Define what you're doing currently on the 7200. If you expect to > do MQC-style shaping per user on WS-X6[12357]xx LCs then you're > unfortunately wrong - You'd need SIPs or ES20/40s to do the job. > > What else?
Not doing anything too special. L2TP, VPDN, PPPoE, OSPF, netflow. No per-session shaping or policing. Does the 7600 family lack anything that the 7200 series has? Stephen _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
