This is a multi part question please bear with me.

Background synopsis: A large (on the order of millions) of output queue drops were causing noticeable breakup of multicast video streams. I learned that the default egress queue size is 160 starting in 12.2.46SE. I upgraded some lab switches, This helped my situation immensely.
However output queue drops continued albeit much less frequently.

Question 1:
From an off-list reply to my original question I was told I could increase the number of queues per interface with this policy-map:

policy-map max-queue
 class class-default
 queue-limit 544

Naturally I would want to apply to this to every interface, however I am unsure if this will be detrimental. What I don't know is where queue space exists: DRAM, a small supply of onboard SRAM? If I allocate 544 queues to every interface on an ME3400-24TS-A will I starve other processes for memory (unlikely check my math below)? If the current default queue size is 160 and I increase it to 544 for all FastEthernet interfaces I would increase the amount of memory usage by 2.25 megabytes:

Queue size is 256 bytes; 24 interfaces.
((256*(544-160)bytes))*24 = 2.25 megabytes

Since these ME3400s are just access switches I seem to always at least 50MB of free memory. Therefore 2.25 MBs doesn't seem like a big impact.

Am I correct in my calculations about the impact of the preceding policy-map applied system wide? Do the output queues live in run of the mill DRAM?


Question 2:

When I do apply the 'max-queue' policy-map to an interface and inspect my work:

sh platform qos debug port-class
sh platform qos debug port-config X

Port Class 0: Queue #3 seems to have my new max-queue setting but every other Port Class and corresponding Queue are still set to 48 (The pre-12.2.46SE default queue size?)

Am I missing something when I use these commands? This is new territory for me.


Question 3:

Are the FastEthernet ports on the ME3400 over subscribed in any way? Can I expect line-rate performance on every port at once or is there an ASIC handling groups of 2^n ports?


Thanks in advance for any help.

****




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to