Thanks Arie On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avay...@cisco.com>wrote:
> Not that I am aware of… > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_relevant_interfaces_and_modules.html > > > > Arie > > > > *From:* Manu Chao [mailto:linux.ya...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, June 09, 2009 18:54 > *To:* Arie Vayner (avayner) > *Cc:* Marlon Duksa; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/IP-VPN capable cards on Cat 6500 > > > > SIP400/SIP600 is 7600 only too > > > > no? > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avay...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Yes, this is true, ES20 is 7600 only (I missed the 6500 angle here ;-) ) > > We can do VPLS with SIP400 (lower BW) or SIP600 (higher BW). > > > > BTW, There is also support for MPLSoGRE > > > > Arie > > > > From: Marlon Duksa [mailto:mdu...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 17:10 > To: Arie Vayner (avayner) > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS/IP-VPN capable cards on Cat 6500 > > > > > Thanks Arie. But ES cards are not supported on Cat6500, no? And also > VPLS over MPLS on a SIP in Cat6500 - is it supported? If so do you know > which SIP? > > Thanks, > > Marlon > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Arie Vayner (avayner) > <avay...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Marlon, > > If you have DFCs on the regular LAN cards, then EoMPLS and L3VPN will be > done in hardware and in distributed forwarding mode. > For VPLS, you need to have either an ES20/ES40 card or a SIP card facing > the core. Having this card means that again VPLS is done in hardware - > some functionality is done on the regular DFCs and some on the egress > core facing module. > > Arie > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa > Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 02:07 > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS/IP-VPN capable cards on Cat 6500 > > Hi -Does anyone know which cards on Cat6500 support MPLS > and separately IP-VPN, posibly at 40Gbps throughput? I'm looking for a > distributed (DFC) forwarding solution? > > I know that Cat6500 is very limited in VPLS support, but IP-VPN and > EoMPLS > should be no problem, right? > > Thanks, > Marlon > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/