I'm looking at REP for use in a metro ethernet environment and am looking for 
some real world opinions on its effectiveness.  The available white paper and 
documentation aren't 100% clear to me that STP can be disabled completely, or 
whether it should still run in addition to REP.  My preference is to remove STP 
from any switch in our network, then burn it, spread its ashes in a field, let 
cattle graze on the grass, then burn the cattle and shoot their remains into 
space on a collision course with the sun.  Apologies to animal rights 
activists, but this should give you an idea of how I really feel about Spanning 
Tree Protocol.

Can anyone share any experiences they've had using REP?  We primarily use 
ME3400s in a ring topology with each end of the ring terminating in a pair of 
6509s.  The 6509s, however, will be repurposed over the next few months as we 
replace them with an alternate vendor's equipment.  Not sure if this matters, 
but figured I'd mention it.  Right now, we use strictly layer 3 on all links 
between nodes on a ring, preventing us from taking advantage of the more 
advanced layer 2 and vrf-lite features of the ME3400s.  This probably poor 
design decision was made due to previously perceived limitations with REP some 
years ago.

Thanks in advance,
evt
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to