On (2009-07-16 14:14 +0100), Phil Mayers wrote: > Ah; and we've got quite aggressive CoPP and punt rate limiters. > Would that mean the traffic would be dropped quite aggressively as > it was punted?
If you're using MLS rate-limiters, I've often seen prefix programmed in ELAM as TTL or MTU rate-limiter index, 0x0380 is MTU failure, 0x7F0A unicast ip error, 0x7FFF ttl failure. These are typically shared with many type of drops, so it's not 100% certain. But unless you see real interface index or 0x7FFA which is recirculate in my experience, it's likely wrong. > As I said, in this case we rebooted the linecard and the problem > seems to have gone. Are there other routes that will reliably > reprogram the hardware? The "mls cef" inconsistency checker seemed > to think all was well. Yeah I guess most reload and thus don't see these issues. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
