>> And therein lies the rub. The objection was to "never be adopted" ... >> I know several of the above (and other large carriers you omitted) >> have "started deploying it", but "started deployment" != "commercially >> available". >> (i.e. - not "easy to request". And for today, I totally agree ... >> that is why I said in "1-3 years".) > >Actually, NTT/Verio have had IPv6 available, as in "commercially available and >fully supported" for a number of years. > >We're mandating full IPv6 support as part of all upstream procurements, and >this has been quite effective :-) - (and it turns away Cogent and L3 >salespeople, which is a nice side effect).
Good point ... in fact, we had NTT/Verio for a bit. Wish we still did (even if they were doing the whole "/126 on point to point links" think). (I meant to include that some carriers do fully offer IPv6 today, but somehow edited that out ... my bad) >gert /TJ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
