> At 15:36 29/07/2009 -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > >Hank, > > > >Any news on what exactly was EOL'ed ? > > I think it was a mistake on their part.
When I saw it I thought it was one of the (various) license options that we all (were supposed to have) bought to run BGP on certain boxes, and that Cisco has recently been bundling into the IOS licenses (technically, it was the InterDomain Routing License option as I recall, but that meant BGP). So it certainly made sense for the license to be EOL'd. So, I never bothered to look further. BGP worked with or without the license (no checks in IOS), but one was supposed to license the use of BGP, which we did (for the 7200s, the 7500s, and the 6500s where appropriate). Cisco makes it difficult to determine the license requirements for features. A gold star for those that knew (ahead of time) that they needed to purchase the FR-IOSSLB license. Gary _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
