The response I got when I asked was that it was an "unintended feature".
That may be the case but it was working just fine. I wish they'd add
the feature. It's really important for 7600s that serve access
functions along with core/distribution functions. The only other
solution is to burn additional ports to separate the 1Q trunk between
pairs of chassis for access VLANs (running a FHRP across the pair of
7600s) and a separate pair of interfaces for the L3 relationship between
the chassis.
Justin
Dean Smith wrote:
So I can only have BFD + eBGP if its on a physical port ?
Does the same apply to SVI + OSPF ?
Any known reason for this limitiation ?
(Waiting for my test 7606s to arrive!)
Dean
----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Shore" <jus...@justinshore.com>
To: "Walter Keen" <walter.k...@rainierconnect.net>
Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:27 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD
Walter Keen wrote:
Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and
sup720-3b) and was wondering if there were any known issues with
certain IOS's in the SRC or SRD train.
BFD support for SVIs was removed with SRB2 if that's something that
you think you'll need.
Justin
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
__________ NOD32 4289 (20090729) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
