Yes, I believe it was you. We are trying to migrate from a 7200 to a
7500 to gain route processor redundancy. Our traffic is typically
20mbit peak from this site between 2 atm ds3's. Using radius, pppoa,
and some dsl subs are behind NAT, but we're slowly weeding them out into
having a typical dsl connection with a public ip. Probably about 1k
subscribers, and in the next year or two we'll probably be moving them
to an ethernet-based handoff from the carriers to us.
Rodney Dunn wrote:
Probably me. ;)
There were some issues around DSL termination in to a VRF that would
not work.
The platform was never targeted for that market space so I wouldn't
use it.
72xx, 10k, or ASR would be the pick.
The ISR's on really really low end side.
Rodney
Buhrmaster, Gary wrote:
I've never been brave enough to try a 7500 for dsl aggregation:)
And while a memory parity error is probably hardware,
I have this vague recollection that someone from
Cisco (Rodney Dunn?) has on a couple of occasions
recommended against using a 7500 for broadband
aggregation, since the platform was simply not
targeted or tested to that role. One *would*
encounter things that do not work, and they would
end up being "won't fix" on that platform.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Walter Keen
Network Technician
Rainier Connect
(o) 360-832-4024
(c) 253-302-0194
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
