PE1 is a 7200 VXR NPE-1G, PE2 is a 2851 with 512MB , both running 12.4(9)T or better. For this customer, less than 10 vrfs on each PE
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:50 PM, William McCall <william.mcc...@gmail.com>wrote: > What kind of boxes are you using for PE? How many VRFs do you have on > the box? What code is running? > > There are limits to the number of OSPF processes (at least on some > platforms and code), so I tend to prefer eBGP, but OSPF has its > obvious advantages. > > --William McCall > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Christopher Hunt<dharmach...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Given a customer with a 10mbps fiber connection into PE1 on a L3 MPLS VPN > > and also a backup ADSL link to PE2 on the same provider's L3 MPLS VPN, > what > > is the best PE-CE protocol to use? I assume we could run eBGP over both > > links and weight them from the provider's end, as well as the customer > end. > > But I'm starting to wonder if PE-CE OSPF wouldn't be a better choice. > The > > customer site only hosts a few /24s and the SP would be the default route > as > > the customer is colocating a firewall at the SP's colo. Any experience > or > > opinions would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > DC > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/