It's probably easier to use the NAT Virtual Interface ("ip nat enable" instead of "ip nat inside|outside") in a VRF environment. You also don't need NAT-on-a-stick with NVI.
Ivan http://www.ioshints.info/about http://blog.ioshints.info/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Andy Saykao [mailto:andy.say...@staff.netspace.net.au] > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:59 AM > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] NAT-ON-A-STICK for VRF Traffic > > I want to set up a NAT-PE Internet Gateway and NAT vrf traffic using > NAT-ON-A-STICK. Is this possible? > > Easy enough to do when it's IP traffic using policy-based > routing as per > this article: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_ > note09186a > 0080094430.shtml > > Just wondering how you would apply the article in relation to when the > traffic is MPLS/VRF based. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/