On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 08:36:33AM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 09:33:46AM +1000, Ben Steele wrote: > > If you can work a solution that incorporates BFD you will be better off in > > the long run(as your router certainly won't get less busy as time goes on) > > if the ultimate goal is fast convergence with 5 exclamation marks :) > > I'd *love* to use BFD, but since there is no BFD on SVIs and no > MUX-UNI for routed subinterfaces, this seems to be a bit difficult... >
if ports usage is not an issue, you can try to stretch a vlan via trunk--->access--->routed ports using external looped cable. Ugly. Best Regards, -mat -- Mateusz Blaszczyk pgp-key 0x64643FCE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
