I have the following two ports on different modules and they have
different QOS scheduling which stops them from being members of a
channel group.
Is there a way to fix this by changing the QOS on one of the
ports ? I wanted to keep the ports on separate boards if possible.
--------
TenGigabitEthernet12/6
Model: WS-X6708-10GE
Type: 10Gbase-LR
Speed: 10000
Duplex: full
Trunk encap. type: 802.1Q,ISL
Trunk mode: on,off,desirable,nonegotiate
Channel: yes
Broadcast suppression: percentage(0-100)
Flowcontrol: rx-(off,on),tx-(off,on)
Membership: static
Fast Start: yes
QOS scheduling: rx-(8q4t), tx-(1p7q4t)
QOS queueing mode: rx-(cos,dscp), tx-(cos,dscp)
CoS rewrite: yes
ToS rewrite: yes
Inline power: no
Inline power policing: no
SPAN: source/destination
UDLD yes
Link Debounce: yes
Link Debounce Time: yes
Ports-in-ASIC (Sub-port ASIC) : 2-3,6,8 (6)
Remote switch uplink: no
Dot1x: yes
Port-Security: yes
---------
TenGigabitEthernet7/4
Model: VS-S720-10G
Type: 10Gbase-LR
Speed: 10000
Duplex: full
Trunk encap. type: 802.1Q,ISL
Trunk mode: on,off,desirable,nonegotiate
Channel: yes
Broadcast suppression: percentage(0-100)
Flowcontrol: rx-(off,on),tx-(off,on)
Membership: static
Fast Start: yes
QOS scheduling: rx-(2q4t), tx-(1p3q4t)
QOS queueing mode: rx-(cos), tx-(cos)
CoS rewrite: yes
ToS rewrite: yes
Inline power: no
Inline power policing: no
SPAN: source/destination
UDLD yes
Link Debounce: yes
Link Debounce Time: yes
Ports-in-ASIC (Sub-port ASIC) : 1-5 (3-4)
Remote switch uplink: no
Dot1x: yes
Port-Security: yes
-----------------
Thanks in advance...
Jeff Fitzwater
OIT Network Systems
Princeton University
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
