Have just tried with another live box running SRD (the original SRD) - exactly the same story.
Does anybody know if this is supported or not? I'm not seeing any documentation which suggests it is not. David. David Freedman wrote: > Yes, I woul absolutely love to, believe me :) > Need to make sure nobody steps in at this point and claims that this is > unsupported, if it is then am happy > to move it to SR and away from 12.4(T) completely. > > ------------------------------------------------ > David Freedman > Group Network Engineering > Claranet Limited > http://www.clara.net > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Shore [mailto:jus...@justinshore.com] > Sent: Mon 9/28/2009 04:06 > To: David Freedman > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Another bughunt, this time VRF PBR > > David Freedman wrote: >> wonder if anybody has come across this before, >> >> in 12.4(15)T, configuring a virtual-access per-user such: > > I hate to suggest the obvious but since there are so many bugs in > 12.4(15)T have you considered bumping that to the latest minor rev? I > think they're up to T7 or T8 now (must have been some bug list). > > Justin > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
