You're right, I was trying to express that the interfaces were able to out
perform / to fast for the processor. I.E. the 2621 example someone listed
earlier.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Hennigan" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco 7206 VXR router
Scott Granados wrote:
Better worded, a common issue with vendor C is that they have processors
that the interfaces can't keep up with. Other vendors including one that
starts with a J have fewer issues in this area.;)
I think you have it bass-ackwards. There are interfaces that the
processors can't keep up with.
--
Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - [email protected]
Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/
Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
