I'm stating a that Feature Set Navigator is unstable for purposes of my research (based on the (d)CEF issue, and lack of updates) and asking for feedback about which train (SY or S) to use on my 12406, given the listed linecards.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Eninja [mailto:eni...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 4:07 PM > To: Leif Sawyer > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; e ninja > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IOS question for c12406 > > Leif, > > Not sure what you're asking but GSR 12K is a distributed > platform where each LC switches packets independently of the > RP....and whatever IOS is running on the box. > > Eninja > > > On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Leif Sawyer <lsaw...@gci.com> wrote: > > > In the process of upgrading from a c12008 to a c12406, with the > > following > > linecards: > > > > SIP-601 + SPA-10X1GE-V2 > > 2 x PRP-2 > > LC-4OC3/POS-SM > > 4GE-SFP-LC > > > > > > Looks like I've got a choice between these two: > > c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-32.SY10.bin > > c12kprp-k4p-mz.120-33.S5.bin > > > > feature-set comparison doesn't list these, but based on the most > > recent version in it, the only difference that I would be concerned > > with is > > CEF/dCEF - Cisco Express Forwarding > > > > however, in botting the SY train, it appears that dCEF truly is > > enabled. > > > > > > Anybody have any experience with these, recommendations, > comments or > > caveats? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Leif > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
