On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 08:58:17AM +1000, David Hughes wrote: > This is the configuration we use. N * GigE port based xconnect on the > south side of the PE router and configure the port-channel on the "ce" > device. Our PEs are multi 10GE attached. This has worked very well for > us. Only problem is picking up loss of link at the far end. You really > have no choice but to rely on aggressive udld to pick up the circuit loss > and take it out of the port-channel. But, in our case the end systems > are 6500s so you can't do fast udld timers. You may have ~~ 1sec > reconvergence at L3 but an L2 issue over a pw takes about 20 seconds to > be picked up by udld.
Would fast rate LACP help here. Should be able to get lacp to notice that the link is missing in < 5 seconds Colin -- Colin Whittaker +353 (0)86 8211 965 http://colin.netech.ie co...@netech.ie _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
