Hi, On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:56:18AM +0100, vince anton wrote: > im looking at using a 7600 to terminate a 10GE uplink for IP transit to my > upstream. no BGP full table yet, just a default route. > > I will be using a 6704 to connect the 7600 my core, of course also using > 10GE links.
We're using 6704 and 6708 to terminate uplinks, and they do the job
nicely. BUT: we have plenty of bandwidth available, so we have no
need for QoS or deep buffers or anything more fancy offered by the SIP
or ES cards.
> Im aware that 6704 is a LAN card, as opposed to using a SIP-600 which is
> intended for WAN which offers deeper buffers, shaping etc... but the price
> difference is enormous!
Yes. Our design choice was "for the total amount of money we have, just
get more bandwidth".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpK5Z63I1YG4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
