Hi, On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 05:50:33PM +0100, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote: > On 2009-11-17 15:12, Gert Doering wrote: > > >(Which makes some sort of sense, *iff* the BFD-handling is done in the > >line card - where it belongs, to be independent of whatever load the > >main CPU is having. OTOH, I don't think normal 6500 LAN cards are smart > >enough to run BFD locally. So whatever...) > > You're right. The current 6500 LCs don't have capability to run BFD > in fully distributed mode. All BFD-bound functionality is job of the > active Supervisor.
Out of curiosity: since the boot messages suggest that 67xx cards with CFC or DFC run "some sort of local IOS" - would those be smart enough? What about SIP and ES cards? So many things still to learn about this platform :-) gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpiGei5yp2hS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/