Hobbs wrote:


On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:38 PM, roy <bandwidth.u...@gmail.com <mailto:bandwidth.u...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote:

                            Does anyone know what the middle number
                            represents in a "debug

        mpls

                            packet" ( eg: {7963 6 254} )?
                            I can't find this information anywhere.

                            7693 = Label
                            6 = ???
                            254 = I presume is the TTL

                            What does the 6 represent??

                        it's the EXP value. you're right about the last
                        being the TTL.

                               oli

                    Could it be the 3-bit EXP and 1-bit Bottom of Stack
                    Flag combined?

                Hmm, why do you think so? Looking at the code, it only
                prints the 3

        exp.

                bits.

            Cisco must have combined RFC3032 [2.1. Encoding the Label
            Stack] into
            one value.


        still not sure what you refer to, and why you think the debug
        discussed
        shows the 4-bit Exp+S value rather than the 3-bit Exp only?


    If I may, MPLS Fundamentals refers to the stack on Fig 2-1 as
    Label/EXP/BoS/TTL. It then breaks this on Example 3-8 with {label
    EXP TTL}. All things held constant; label at 20, TTL at 8, then EXP
    must be 3+1.

    Roy

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
    <mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Reading too much into it. It's just not showing the stack bit. The output is for information. You don't need to know the stack bit, its the only label. And if there were more than one, then it would show all labels.

Right on, too much reading. I didn't take the text as it is. Oli was on spot. Cheers!

Roy
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to