On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:04:37AM -0800, Kenny Sallee wrote: > My .02 is that you should put everything in VRF's (even the global table) > and use route-target import/export and import maps (if required) to control > routing domains. > > Question - can you use 'neighbor allowas-in' instead of as-override? I'm > not sure why your BGP AS-PATH was wrong in scenario #3 above - but I'm using > that in a very similar scenario in my lab to solve the problem of having the > same eBGP AS used at 2 different sites connected to 2 different PE routers. > BGP won't advertise a path it receives w/ it's own ASN in the path > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/mpls/command/reference/mp_n5gt.html#wp1007547
I don't see how allowas-in would help - my ASN doesn't even appear in
those routes yet. They come out the other side as eBGP routes with
whatever private ASN I used to make the session to eBGP.
--
Ross Vandegrift
r...@kallisti.us
"If the fight gets hot, the songs get hotter. If the going gets tough,
the songs get tougher."
--Woody Guthrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
