-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
Andy B. schrieb: > I have other cores that do 40 times more BGP and they work like charm, > with the exception that they do not have a few thousand servers > connected to them. Only customers with routers. > These routers are similar to this 6509, so nothing better or worse. How about splitting the servers into different vlans? should lower the broadcasts etc and may help... (its hard for me to belive that you have one /19 or similar configured to one vlan, i hope there are a few subnets ;) Regards, Sven -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktxcr8ACgkQQoCguWUBzBxNJACgoic90h9xxDA8VASDwyJ4OmP4 QMwAoIz/VigSz2nch4cRZXDcVZ1jaViC =LtsD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
