>>- does not support 10/100, only 1000
sigh... I just got bit by this one again trying to install a
vendor-provided server with 10/100 interfaces only.
Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 28/01/2010 20:54, Livio Zanol Puppim wrote:
Can anyone please tell me the advantages of using Nexus 2000 over Catalyst
4948 as access layers switches?
Using Nexus 2000, I have to use at least 2 ports at my Nexus 5000, that
could be used by servers with 10GbE/FCoE servers.
the current generation of n2k:
- does not support 10/100, only 1000
- has serious etherchannel limitations
- no netflow
- no rspan / erspan
It's an interesting switch which should improve lots in the next generation
of hardware. But right now, it is very specifically aimed at a particular
niche. For that niche, it will perform very well indeed, but it's not
really a general purpose access switch.
wrt NX-OS vs. IOS, they are two different systems. NX-OS is very young in
its development cycle; IOS is much more mature and has many more features.
Nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/