> Ethernet is not designed for p2p but can be used for this purpose. > OSI allow any L3 over L2 Ethernet, there is no issue with IPv4 @
Sure. And we use Ethernet as point to point technology too. However, that is an entirely different statement than saying that /31 is "well supported" on Ethernet. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > 2010/3/8, [email protected] <[email protected]>: > >> You needn't /30 anymore, rfc3021 is well suported for a while ;) > > > > Yes, RFC 3021 is well supported on *actual* point to point links (e.g. > > SDH/SONET). Ethernet is *not* such a type of link. > > > > There are lots of people who use /31 on Ethernet links without any > > apparent problems. However ... > > > > Some of us have tried (hard) to get Cisco and Juniper to come forward > > with an official statement about whether /31 is supported or not on > > Ethernet links. We have been entirely unsuccessful - the answer we > > receive is always of the type "try it, it may work for you". That is > > not "well supported" by my definition of the word. > > > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > > > > -- > Envoyé avec mon mobile > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
