-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/16/2010 9:19 AM, Drew Weaver wrote: > Hi, > > I believe most people feel that a /126 should be used the same place you > would use /30
FWIW, the recent NANOG meeting discussed numbering your IPv6 links. http://nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/abstracts.php?pt=MTU1NCZuYW5vZzQ4&nm=nanog48 Best advice I thought was regardless of what scheme you decide to use (/126, /112, etc), reserve the entire /64 so that you don't shoot yourself in the foot in case some new "must have" feature appears and requires a /64 on ptp links. - -- Devon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkufiCEACgkQWP2WrBTHBS8YTACfZuEY2PjPGTmlbAK0i3HoVQDk IiEAnAqj8jSpTNQ9u3KEgHOZ1TQ1ZpE1 =lx+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
