Numbered ACLs are recompiled at every line you insert, so the CPU is stuck at 100% while loading the ACL. Named ACLs are only recompiled when you exit the ACL context, the CPU keeps at 100% for a few seconds and it's done.
Rubens On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Jan Sandmaier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > there is a statement in the Cisco 7600 config guide for 12.2SR which > puzzles me. > > "The PFC/DFC provides more efficient hardware support for named ACLs > than it can for numbered ACLs" > > Can anybody tell me what "more efficient" means in detail? > > Thanks, > Jan > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
