On Saturday 17 April 2010 04:46:20 am Bill Blackford wrote: > Does anyone have any input on this? I've seen some noise > on the list before claiming how the ASR's simply do not > support Ethernet link aggregation at this time. Anyone > know whether or not it's in the feature roadmap?
Running IOS XE 2.6.0(XNF) here, LACP works well. One problem, though - ingress QoS is currently unsupported on the port-channel interfaces. While the recommended workaround would be to add them to member links, they don't work there either. Support should follow in coming releases (it's a real bummer!). I'm also getting my SE to confirm on other limitations, e.g., support for only up to 4 members in the LAG. My recommendation would be go for 2.6.0(XNF) as that offers a number of improvements in GEC (Gigabit EthernetChannel), as Cisco call it, e.g., better load sharing algorithms, e.t.c. Hope this helps. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
