On Thursday 20 May 2010 09:19:46 pm Mohammad Khalil wrote: > Dears > > when implementing a cache engine what is the best way to > do it , route-map or WCCP ?
WCCP is generally preferred due to its "resiliency" in case a cache server becomes unavailable. PBR works too but has no knowledge of the state of the cache server. It's great for testing though, as WCCP (from the time I played with it) was not particularly consistent re: stability between various trains or train revisions. Things could have changed now, though. The network I play with now can't support caching due to the business model. So I haven't done the caching thing in a bit :-). Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
