On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists wrote:
"OSPF for Routed Access" is not limited to a single area. You can find the limitations in e.g. the Catalyst 4500 Release Notes (Sup6 only): "OSPF for Routed Access supports only one OSPFv2 and one OSPFv3 instance with a maximum number of 200 dynamically learned routes".
So, what would you do with that? Put each "OSPF for Routed Access" switch in its own NSSA area uplinked to a more capable ASBR, using OSPF to advertise customer routes, but learning nothing but a default?
BTW...is there really a 3650 switch, or is that just a very common typo for 3560? It's even in some cisco documents.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_data_sheet09186a00801cfb71.html http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750e_3560e/software/release/12.2_37_se/configuration/guide/swintro.html Catalyst 3750-E and 3560-E Switch Software Configuration Guide, 12.2(37)SE The examples also apply to the Catalyst 3650-E switch. In the previous example, the specified interface on a Catalyst 3560-E switch is gigabitethernet0/5 (without the stack member number of 1/). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
