Did you take into consideration all of the 6500 platform limitations and apply rate limiters?
thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rudy Setiawan Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 5:35 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Speed problem and router seems to sluggish Hi all, I need some light on this problem that I'm having. We implemented 2 new routers with the following devices/modules: core2:: Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE 3 8 8 port 1000mb ethernet WS-X6408-GBIC 4 8 8 port 1000mb GBIC Enhanced QoS WS-X6408A-GBIC 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B 7 8 8 port 1000mb GBIC Enhanced QoS WS-X6408A-GBIC 8 8 8 port 1000mb ethernet WS-X6408-GBIC 9 48 48 port 10/100 mb RJ45 WS-X6348-RJ-45 Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status ---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- ------- 2 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3B SAL1222S11H 4.6 Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1012GLH0 2.2 Ok 5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1012GG2H 2.4 Ok border2:: border2#sh mod Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No. --- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 2 4 CEF720 4 port 10-Gigabit Ethernet WS-X6704-10GE 3 8 8 port 1000mb GBIC Enhanced QoS WS-X6408A-GBIC 4 8 8 port 1000mb GBIC Enhanced QoS WS-X6408A-GBIC 5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3BXL Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status ---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- ------- 2 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3B SAL10489CQ0 4.4 Ok 5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3BXL SAD111706XS 1.8 Ok 5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAD111608DE 2.6 Ok Border2 interface Te2/1 is connected to an Internet Provider (Using XENPAK-10GB-ER) Border2 interface Te2/2 is connected to Core2 interface Te2/1 (Using XENPAK-10GB-LX4) In Core2, we have a customer who is connected via a Port-Channel (interface Gi 3/7 and Gi 3/8) who is usually pulling 1.2Gbps inbound of traffic from the Internet. This customer is having an issue where it can not pull more than 150Mbps inbound. But from our existing network (2Gbps uplinks), he can pull 1.2 Gbps of inbound no problem. The two networks have the same Internet Provider. There are no QOS enabled on both border2 or core2:: border2#sh mls qos QoS is disabled globally border2# Routing Protocol: BGP on the provider peer. Border2 and Core2: OSPF a simple one both have redistribute static and connected Then we tried to move the port-channel for the customer to border2, the router seems to respond very slowly to keyboard input ("due to high traffic of 150Mbps") but after shutting down the port-channel, the keyboard input seems fine (no more sluggish). Network seems good. Please let me know what I did wrong. If you need additional info, please let me know. Thank you Regards, Rudy _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/