Hi, I guess I have just opened jac-in-the-box here :). IMHO if Tier1 accept these prefixes it is ok. Hands up anyone who does not have 0.0.0.0/0 in their network pointing to the upstream :). Could be problem for smaller providers though.
Best regards, Jan On 30. 6. 2010 16:00, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: >> Well, I just did a quick look up on the current routing table, and it >> seems that there are quite a few /25 and /26 in there with quite long >> as-paths, so it seems that this "nothing longer than /24" policy is not >> strongly enforced. > > I'd say that depends. We certainly enforce /24 at our borders, and have > no plans to change that policy. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
