Correct. OC12 is as high as we went but the email said GE/FE uplinks so I took 622 as an effective traffic rate not interface type.
-Ben On Jul 14, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Mark Tinka wrote: > >> On Wednesday 14 July 2010 02:37:09 pm Mikael Abrahamsson >> wrote: >> >>> Afaik there is no STM-4 POS interface for 7200, which was >>> a requirement. >> >> Not anymore, no. > > Anymore? As far as I know there never has been one, only OC12 SRP (which only > allowed for ~120 megabit/s of traffic to be add/dropped on the ring). > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
