On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 01:46 +0300, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > We're thinking of using the following as a dsl pool: > > ip local pool test-pool 192.168.0.0 192.168.255.255 > > which means 192.168.x.0 and 192.168.x.255 will be given as ip > addresses to hosts (CPEs and PCs). > > Has anyone met any issues with .0 and .255 as host addresses?
We have used /23 and larger DHCP pools and have never had any problems with addresses ending in .0 and .255. I could imagine one or two retarded (personal) firewalls that would balk at those, but I don't think anything mainstream does. Are they for PtP links? Where on the PC would the address be used, i.e. what interface? -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
