On 14/08/2010, at 11:09 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > >> What I don't understand is why the OSPF route is not more specific? Or is >> this another case of announcing /24s (or even smaller blocks) via eBGP? > > It is just the same /24 route belonging to one internet exchange. Most IX > prefixes are forbidden to be announced, but this one is unfortunately the > exception :/
As this seems to be only for the 1 network - a simple solution may be to simply filter this route on your gateway and ensure it never even enters your network. Regards Andrew _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
