Dear All, Anybody have tested these values ( http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf) , since 64bytes on 1841 doesn't give the provided results (30Mbps).
Regards, Gobinath. On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Christopher J. Wargaski <war...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks, Elmar. That *was* too easy and way too intuitive. (I did not > expect that from Cisco. ;-) > > > Humbly, > cjw > > > > Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 10:39:44 +0200 > > From: "Elmar K. Bins" <e...@4ever.de> > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Routers: Performance benchmark > > Message-ID: <20100902083944.gv35...@ronin.4ever.de> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > war...@gmail.com (Christopher J. Wargaski) wrote: > > > >> Thanks for posting the URL for the router performance matrix. Anyone > >> know of a similar matrix for switches (L2 & L3) and firewalls? > > > > Have you tried s/router/switch/ in the URL? > > > > Life can be so easy. > > > > > >> > Not all as requested, but a start: > >> > > >> > > http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
