its core transport network for connectivity betweeen GSM packet core devices.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Keegan Holley <keegan.hol...@sungard.com> wrote: > Unless all 20 subnets are exactly the same, you may not need mpls at all. > Why did you go with MPLS in the first place? What sort of network is it? > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:51 PM, jack daniels <jckdaniel...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm stuck in the understanding - does oit make sense to implement MPLS >> AutoBandwidth in scenario where I have only 20 subnets max to be sent >> on this Backbone. What will be pros and corns of this , if u experts >> can show me a path. >> >> >> Thanks and Regards >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Rathlev <pe...@rathlev.dk> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:21 +0530, jack daniels wrote: >> >> hope MPLS TE - Auto-bandwidth enhancement and MPLS TE - >> >> Auto-bandwidth allocator are same feature >> > >> > That seems strange. So you're saying you don't need something technical >> > solution to a problem you have, you need a feature called >> > "Auto-bandwidth allocator"? Even if Cisco defined that to be something >> > controlling the LEDs on your front panels and nothing else? :-) >> > >> > Googling "Auto-bandwidth allocator" gives a link to a document >> > (apparantly from 2006) describing the feature for 7500 and 7200. >> > Skimming that document and the more recent one about the 7600 points >> > towards the latter being an evolved version of the former. That took me >> > about 2 minutes at most. I shouldn't have. >> > >> > -- >> > Peter >> > >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
