Thanks for the info. I'm looking for a Cisco solution that takes up the least amount of rack space and can handle full table. Any suggestions?
Jimmy Changa via Droid On Sep 27, 2010 5:47 PM, "Łukasz Bromirski" <luk...@bromirski.net> wrote: > On 2010-09-27 23:16, Charles Klement wrote: >> I believe that there is only enough tcam to support about 250000 ipv4 routes. > > Exactly. The 4900M job is not to be a edge BGP router. It's a > TOR switch. > > As usual, one can fiddle with the incoming prefixes filtering to get > everything still in FIB fitting the TCAMs, it's better than 11-20k FIB > limit for Cat 3Ks, but it's not the ASR 1k or 7600 Sup720BXL/CXL 1mln > of them. > > -- > "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski > If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
