MAP GE to 4 STM1 -- STM1 form (PROVIDER A) STM1 form (PROVIDER A) STM1 form (PROVIDER B) STM1 form (PROVIDER B)
This is done for redundancy ...In case Providers ( A ) go down then we have only 155*2 BW left.(CONGESTION) On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Keegan Holley <[email protected]> wrote: > An STM is simply a group of time slots over the existing physical path. It > would be pretty strange for an STM to go down without the entire circuit > going down. Less strange would be misconfiguration, but that has all the > standard hooks. If you own the layer-1 equipment then change control > policies would help with this. I'm personally not aware of a way to monitor > capacity from within the circuit without testing and trying to use all the > available bandwidth, which would defeat the purpose. > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:56 AM, jack daniels <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I have a EOSDH as a primary link in which GE is mapped to 4 STM-1 >> >> and backup path is another GE Link. >> >> In case 2 STM-1 out of 4 STM-1 in EOSDH fail my routing will not be >> aware of that and will not reroute the traffic to backup GE. >> This will lead to congestion on Primary link , while backup path not >> at all be used. >> Is there any way to work out this issue. >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
