I've been running this in our lab and "test backbone" node for some time. There appears to be little/no impact for our environment compared to SXI4a.
Going from SXF to SXI is a fairly decent jump. If you run BGP with a full or semi-full table, expect to see slower RIB -> FIB (TCAM) population of routing changes. Then again, if you need 4-byte-asn support, SXI is really where you want to be for now. - Jared On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Chris Evans wrote: > Cisco has us reviewing this code as our call forward from sxi3. It's supposed > to be pretty good. > > On Nov 8, 2010 8:05 PM, "Antonio Soares" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Anyone running SXI5 already ? I need to upgrade some 6500s running 12.2SXF > > and I don't know if I should stay at SXI4/SXI4a or take the risk and go with > > SXI5. I see that SXI5 fixes 135 bugs but which ones affect SXI4/SXI4a ? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > > > Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S/SP) > > [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch > > Sent: segunda-feira, 1 de Novembro de 2010 17:44 > > To: cisco-nsp List > > Subject: [c-nsp] FYI: SXI5 posted > > > > I know there are a lot of 6500 users out there, wanted to give a heads-up > > that SXI5 has reached CCO. > > > > - Jared > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
